Poster Session 2
Category: Hypertension
Poster Session 2
Mayra Alejandra Shafique, MD, MS (she/her/hers)
Resident Physician
University of Michigan, OBGYN Department
Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
Ashley Williams, MS
University of Michigan
Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
Ashley M. Hesson, MD, PhD (she/her/hers)
Assistant Professor (divisions of Maternal Fetal Medicine and Cardiovascular Medicine)
University of Michigan
Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
Elizabeth S. Langen, MD
Clinical Associate Professor (Maternal Fetal Medicine)
University of Michigan
Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
Joanne M. Bailey, CNM
Nurse Midwife Director, Collegiate Lecturer
University of Michigan
University of Michigan, Michigan, United States
Molly J. Stout, MD, MS (she/her/hers)
Associate Professor
University of Michigan
Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
Jourdan E. Triebwasser, MA, MD (she/her/hers)
Clinical Associate Professor
University of Michigan
Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
Natasha R. Kumar, MD, MSCE (she/her/hers)
Assistant Professor
University of Michigan, Department of OBGYN
Ann arbor, Michigan, United States
Remote home blood pressure (BP) monitoring improves postpartum BP acquisition, mitigates racial disparities in follow-up, reduces urgent postpartum care for individuals with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP). Successful program implementation relies on engagement by patients, clinicians and administrators, but there is a paucity of data on stakeholder perspectives. We assessed the impact of a 10-day text message support program including escalation of care via phone calls and a telemedicine visit upon completion.
Study Design:
Semi-structured key informant interviews of individuals with HDP (n=10), OB clinicians (n=12) and obstetric hospital administrators (n=4) were performed to assess barriers and facilitators to postpartum transitions to primary care after engagement with remote BP monitoring using the socioecological model at a single academic center. Interviews were coded using grounded theory until thematic saturation was achieved.
Results:
Patients attributed high levels of self-efficacy, i.e. sense of control over their health, due to the program’s behavioral nudges (Table 1). They experienced increased connection with providers with ongoing and rapid engagement by the clinical team. Clinicians and patients felt that this program improved organizational efficiency with clinical decisions (Table 2). Clinicians and administrators appreciated remote care delivery, which increased appointment availability for other issues (Table 2). However, patients desired opportunities for more frequent touchpoints with clinicians regarding other postpartum issues. Patients’ understanding of long-term CVD risks beyond program completion was limited. Some patients desired more in-person care.
Conclusion:
Home blood pressure monitoring is positively perceived by both providers and patients. However, there are unmet opportunities for improved patient education about long-term CVD risks outside the immediate postpartum period suggesting a critical gap in immediate postpartum provider to longer-term primary care provider transitions.