Poster Session 1
Category: Diabetes
Poster Session 1
Nicole Loza, BA
Second-Year Medical Student
Duke University School of Medicine
Duke University/Durham, North Carolina, United States
Alexis D. Pean, BS, MS
Student
Duke University School of Medicine
Duke University/Durham, North Carolina, United States
Tina Liu, BA
Second-Year Medical Student
Duke University School of Medicine
Duke University/Durham, North Carolina, United States
Navya Kancharla
Undergraduate Student
Duke University School of Medicine
Duke University/Durham, North Carolina, United States
Rachel L. Wood, MD (she/her/hers)
Assistant Professor of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University
Durham, North Carolina, United States
Madeline Morello, BS, MS
Manager of Quality and Safety
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University
Durham, North Carolina, United States
Sarah K. Dotters-Katz, MD
Associate Professor of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University
Duke University/Durham, North Carolina, United States
IRB approved retrospective cohort study of patients presenting for initial OB visit in the 1st trimester within the first 3 months of guideline implementation (10/1-12/31/2024) in our large academic health system. Outcome measure was percent of patients correctly screened for diabetes testing(with A1c). Process measures included: % receiving A1c who should not have, % not receiving A1c who should have, & common screening errors.
962 patients presented for an initial prenatal visit in the 1st trimester in the study period. 766(79.6%) were correctly screened for A1c testing, including 31(3.2%) with known DM. 179(18.6%) patients were incorrectly screened & 17(1.8%) were correctly screened but did not have correct DM test performed. Of 179 incorrectly screened, 112(62.6% of incorrectly screened) had unindicated A1c drawn, including 54(30.2%) who did not meet BMI threshold & 58(32.4%) who met the BMI threshold but had no additional risk factor. Of note, white patients were most likely to be incorrectly tested on basis of BMI alone(n=32). None of the incorrectly tested patients were found to have pre-existing DM. Of the 84 that should have had A1c drawn, 67(79.7% of those missing indicated A1c) were incorrectly screened, 5(6.0%) screened correctly but A1c not ordered, 8(9.5%) had A1c ordered but not drawn, & 4(4.8%) had GTT ordered(Figure 1).
With implementation of the new ACOG screening guidelines, correct application of screening occurred in 79.6% individuals. The majority of missed screening resulted in over testing for DM. Continued education is necessary to increase screening accuracy.