Poster Session 3
Category: Health Equity/Community Health
Poster Session 3
Kelsey McNew, MD, PhD
Resident
Duke University School of Medicine
Durham, North Carolina, United States
Shakthi Unnithan, MS
Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics
Duke University School of Medicine
Durham, North Carolina, United States
Tracy Truong, MS
Biostatistician
Duke University Medical Center
Durham, North Carolina, United States
Thelma Fitzgerald, BS
Duke University School of Medicine
Durham, North Carolina, United States
Adwoa A. Baffoe-Bonnie, BS
Medical Student
Duke University School of Medicine
Durham, North Carolina, United States
Barvina Toledo, MA
Duke University School of Medicine
Durham, North Carolina, United States
Danielle Lanpher, BS
Duke University School of Medicine
Durham, North Carolina, United States
Kelley E. C. Massengale, MPH, PhD
Diaper Bank of North Carolina
Durham, North Carolina, United States
Maya Jackson, BA
MAAME, Inc.
Durham, North Carolina, United States
Sarahn M. Wheeler, MD
Associate Professor of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University
Duke University/Durham, North Carolina, United States
Obstetric providers are rarely trained on employment laws that impact pregnant workers. Thus, we developed the Provider Remote Obstetric-Related Employment Education (PROMOTE) intervention, a 30-minute online training and documentation toolkit. We pilot-tested PROMOTE and evaluated the employment experiences, care adherence, and financial strain of patients.
Study Design:
We conducted a pre/post intervention pilot at a single high-risk OB clinic. Patients who self-identified as Black or White race between 24 weeks gestation – 12 weeks postpartum with wage-earning employment were surveyed at a single timepoint about their employment experiences using the NIH PhenX toolkit and a validated financial stain index. Outpatient appointment adherence was determined via chart review. PROMOTE was offered over three months to all clinical team members. The post-intervention patient group was recruited using the same criteria. We compared employment experiences, financial strain, and outpatient visit adherence by pre- and post-intervention, self-identified race, and hourly vs salaried employment using descriptive statistics with SAS 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC).
Results:
42 clinical team members completed the PROMOTE training. 97 patients (50 pre- and 47 post-intervention) completed surveys. Demographics were similar between the two groups (Table 1). There were no differences in financial strain or adherence to outpatient visits between the pre- and post-intervention groups (Table 2). Black participants had higher financial strain than their White counterparts (8.9 (3.7) vs 5.0 (2.6), p < 0.0001), as did hourly workers compared to salaried (8.5 (3.8) vs 4.9 (2.5), p < 0.0001). Hourly employed respondents were more likely to report a decrease in their work hours during pregnancy (30.8% vs 6.7% for salaried workers, p = 0.0058).
Conclusion:
While we did not detect any pre/post PROMOTE differences in financial strain or adherence to care, we demonstrate the need for Black and hourly workers to be well represented in future studies on employment as a social driver of obstetric outcomes.