Poster Session 4
Category: Labor
Poster Session 4
Stephanie Guang, MD
Columbia University
New York, New York, United States
Katherine L. Grantz, MD, MSCR
Senior Investigator
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health
Bethesda, Maryland, United States
Mathew Bruckner, MS
The Prospective Group, Inc.
Fairfax, Virginia, United States
Advait Nene, MS
Carnegie Mellon University
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
Jessica Gleason, PhD
NICHD, NIH
Bethesda, Maryland, United States
Neil Perkins, PhD
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health
Bethesda, Maryland, United States
Rajeshwari L. Sundaram, PhD
Senior Investigator
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health
Bethesda, Maryland, United States
Of the 103,415 parturients assessed, 3,519 (3.5%) had prolonged second stage of labor Mean second stage duration was 0.85 hours (SD 1.02). The random forest model had the best performance with area under the curve of 0.80 (95% CI 0.78-0.81) for all deliveries, 0.81 in multiparous and 0.72 in nulliparas.(Table 1) Overall, the most important features selected in best predictive models included parity, station at full dilation, cervical examination data at admission and maternal age.(Figure) Cervical dilation on admission was the predominant prediction factor for multiparas; in contrast, there were multiple factors for nulliparas, with maternal age, admission contractions, epidural and cervical effacement leading.
Conclusion:
These findings demonstrate utility of machine learning in predicting prolonged second stage of labor using data available to the obstetric provider. Machine learning plays a promising role in creating individualized predictions to support clinical risk assessment during labor.