Oral Concurrent Session 2 - Diabetes
Oral Concurrent Sessions
Amy M. Valent, DO (she/her/hers)
Associate Professor, Dept. of OBGYN - MFM Division
Oregon Health & Science University
Portland, Oregon, United States
Celeste Durnwald, MD (she/her/hers)
Professor, OB/GYN, Maternal Fetal Medicine
Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
Katrina Ramsey, MPH
Oregon Health & Science University
Portland, Oregon, United States
Emily Fay, MD
University of Washington
Seattle, Washington, United States
Nicole M. Ehrhardt, MD
Assistant Professor of Medicine
University of Washington
Seattle, Washington, United States
Of 223 total participants with GDM among the 3 RCTs, 205 were included in the final analysis. Approximately 16% (n=32) of the participants had a neonate with an adverse outcome. Individuals with a higher percent TIR (63-140mg/dL) had lower neonatal composite outcome, particularly in the lower range 63-120 mg/dL; Figure. For a one-category difference in TIR, there was an 18% reduction in neonatal risk using the standard pregnancy TIR (63-140 mg/dL; RR 0.82 [95% CI 0.69, 0.98]) and a 21% reduction using the lower glycemic range (63-120 mg/dL; RR 0.79 [95% CI 0.64, 0.97]). Adverse neonatal outcomes were associated with higher time above range (TAR) >140mg/dL (median [IQR]: 7 [4-15] vs 4% [2-10]) and TAR >120mg/dL (24 [14-40] vs 16% [10-27]). TIR correlated with the 24-h mean glucose with the lowest risk among those with a 24-h mean glucose < 95 mg/dL.
Conclusion:
Adverse neonatal outcomes are common among pregnancies complicated by GDM. For every categorical improvement in glucose TIR, there is a significant risk reduction in adverse neonatal outcomes. Future prospective studies are needed to validate these findings.