Poster Session 1
Category: Intrapartum Fetal Assessment
Poster Session 1
Shohra Qaderi, MD
Baylor College of Medicine
Houston, Texas, United States
Weston Northam, MD
Neurosurgeon
Boston Children's Hospital
boston, Massachusetts, United States
Soner Duru, MD
Associate researcher
Cincinnati
Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
Eyal Krispin, MD (he/him/his)
Fetal Surgeon
Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Nikan Zargarzadeh, MD (she/her/hers)
Research Fellow
Boston Children's Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Ali Javinani, MD (he/him/his)
OB/GYN Resident
The George Washington University Hospital
Washington, District of Columbia, United States
Jose L. Peiro, MD, PhD
New York University Langone Health Fetal Research Lab
New York, New York, United States
Hamidreza Forourtan
Laparoscopy Research Center
Shiraz, Fars, Iran
Ehsan Rojhani, MD
Postdoctoral Research Fellow
Boston Children's Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Enaja Sambatur, MD (she/her/hers)
Clinical Research Specialist
Southeast Health Medical Center
Southeast Health Medical Center, Alabama, United States
Faezeh Aghajani, MD
Postdoctoral Research Fellow
Boston Children's Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Erdem Fadiloglu, MD
Hacettepe Uni
Ankara, Ankara, Turkey
Claudio V. Schenone, MD (he/him/his)
Fetal surgery fellow
Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Akihiro Hasegawa
BCH
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Lucas Peiro
Cincinnati
Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
Ellen Grant
BCH
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Ramen H. Chmait, MD (he/him/his)
Director, Los Angeles Fetal Surgery; Professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Keck School of Medicine of USC, University of Southern California
Keck School of Medicine of USC, University Of Southern California, California, United States
Benjamin C. Warf
BCH
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Kjersti M. Aagaard, MD, MSCI, PhD
Medical Director, HCA Healthcare and HCA Research Institute
HCA
Houston, Texas, United States
Alireza A. Shamshirsaz, MD (he/him/his)
Department Director, Professor of Surgery
Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
We evaluated the safety and initial efficacy of intrauterine placement of a ventriculosubgaleal Shunt (VSGS) using a fetal lamb obstructive hydrocephalus model.
Hydrocephalus was induced in fetuses at 91–93 days of gestation by injecting 1–2 mL of BioGlueⓇ into the cisterna magna under ultrasound (US) guidance. Two weeks later, after confirming the hydrocephalus with US, a paramedian laparotomy and hysterotomy were performed under general anesthesia. Next, the fetal head was exposed through the hysterotomy and the distal end of the VSGS was placed in a lateral ventricle, while the proximal end was tunneled subcutaneously (0.5-0.8 mm) and fixed with interrupted silk stitches using a transuterine or hysterotomy-assisted approach. Finally, ewes were euthanized late gestation and fetuses delivered by hysterotomy. Lambs underwent gross inspection and postmortem saline dye testing to assess shunt patency.
We included eleven fetuses. Nine underwent successful transuterine hydrocephalus induction, while two required a hysterotomy-assisted approach due to difficulty accessing the cisterna magna. At two weeks, one ewe containing two fetuses required euthanasia due to intrauterine demise and severe uterine adhesions. Therefore, a total of nine fetuses underwent hysterotomy-assisted VSGS placement (Table 1). The duration from scalp incision to closure was 5–10 minutes. At cesarean delivery, two out of seven fetuses were demised (22% post-VSGS loss). Skin was fully healed, and the shunt remained in position in all seven survivors. Two of seven shunts (28%) were confirmed patent during post-mortem examination (Figure 1), while the others were occluded by fibrin or debris. No cases exhibited sub scalp cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) accumulation or bulging.
VSGS placement is technically feasible, with short operative times and high rates of technical success. Post-procedure loss rates were lower than in the first study phase (22% vs 40%). Shunt patency was achieved in only 28% of successfully inserted catheters.