Poster Session 2
Category: Diabetes
Poster Session 2
Jacqueline Rice, BS, MD (she/her/hers)
Resident
University of Illinois at Chicago
Chicago, Illinois, United States
Ayesha Hasan, MD (she/her/hers)
Assistant Professor
University of Illinois at Chicago
Chicago, Illinois, United States
Lauren Larocca, FNP, MSN, RN
University of Illinois at Chicago
Chicago, Illinois, United States
Nicole Hsing-Smith, BA
University of Illinois at Chicago
Chicago, Illinois, United States
Quetzal Class, PhD
University of Illinois at Chicago
Chicago, Illinois, United States
Maintaining intrapartum maternal euglycemia decreases adverse neonatal outcomes. Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) is a new tool that may be employed in lieu of standard fingerstick point-of-care (POC) measurements during labor. We examined differences in neonatal outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) or medication-controlled gestational diabetes (A2GDM) who used CGM versus POC glucose measurements for intrapartum monitoring.
Study Design:
We performed a retrospective chart review of patients with T2DM or A2GDM by ICD-10 who delivered between 9/2020-7/2024 at an urban academic hospital. Exclusion criteria were diet-controlled (A1) gestational diabetes, type 1 diabetes, multifetal gestation, antenatal steroid administration within 14 days of delivery, non-laboring (e.g. scheduled cesarean section), and nonviable pregnancies. We matched the POC group to CGM users by diabetes class, BMI, and age at delivery using randomized matching. Chi-square and t-tests were performed to evaluate maternal and fetal outcomes between groups.
Results:
Of 80 patients who met inclusion criteria, 35% (n=28) used CGM intrapartum while 65% (n=52) were monitored with standard POC measurements. Race, ethnicity, and type of diabetes mellitus did not differ across groups. Mean glucose was higher (109.7 vs. 100.2 mg/dL; U=970, p< 0.05) and time-in-range (70-110 mg/dL) lower (59.2; vs 72.1 percent; U=518.5, p< 0.05) in the CGM group. Though neonatal hypoglycemia was rare (3.8%, n=3), occurrences were not significantly different between groups (X2 (1) = 1.56, p=0.21). Similarly, need for insulin drip during labor (X2 (1) = 0.30, p=0.87) and maternal treatment of hypoglycemia (X2 (1) = 0.06, p=0.89) were not significantly different. Neonatal outcomes including gestational age, birthweight, birthweight percentile, initial glucose measurement, and hospital length of stay did not differ by group.
Conclusion:
Important clinical outcomes did not differ between CGM and POC glucose measurement groups during the intrapartum period for patients with A2GDM or T2DM.