Poster Session 3
Category: Labor
Poster Session 3
Shai Ram, MD
Ichilov Tel Aviv Israel
ichilov, HaMerkaz, Israel
Roy Bitan, MD, MHA
Lis Hospital for Women’s Health
Tel Aviv, Tel Aviv, Israel
Michael Lavie, MD
Ichilov Tel Aviv Israel
ichilov, HaMerkaz, Israel
Dotan Madar, MD
Ichilov Tel Aviv Israel
ichilov, HaMerkaz, Israel
Anat Lavie, MD
Lis Hospital for Women’s Health, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center
Lis Hospital for Women’s Health, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel
Yariv Yogev, MD
Lis Hospital for Women’s Health, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center Gray Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Israel
Lis Hospital for Women’s Health, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel
Roza Shperling-Berkovitz, MD, MPH
Lis Hospital for Women’s Health, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center
ichilov, HaMerkaz, Israel
1. Among 11,219 eligible women, 4,347 (38.7%) were nulliparous, 6,725 (59.9%) multiparous, and 147 (1.3%) grand multiparous.
2. Mean PROM-to-delivery intervals were significantly longer in nulliparous women compared to multiparous and grand multiparous women (13.39±11.26 vs 10.22±10.00 and 10.42±11.25 hours, respectively; p < .001).
3. Percentile analysis based on the cumulative proportion of women who had delivered following PROM revealed a biphasic pattern among grand multiparas: up to the 60th percentile (i.e., among the earlier 60% of deliveries), PROM-to-delivery intervals resembled those of multiparas. However, beyond the 70th percentile - among women who had not yet delivered by that point—labor progression slowed, and their delivery intervals began to approximate those of nulliparas
Conclusion:
While grand multiparous women generally experience shorter labor following term PROM, prolonged cases demonstrate a shift toward nulliparous-like patterns. This biphasic progression might inform clinical management.