Poster Session 4
Category: Clinical Obstetrics
Poster Session 4
Roie Alter, MD (he/him/his)
Hadassah Medical Center and Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
Jerusalem, Yerushalayim, Israel
Inbal Akavian, MD, MPH
Hadassah Ein-karem hospital, Obstetrics and gynecology department, Jerusalem
Jerusalem, Yerushalayim, Israel
Shlomo Yahalomy, MD
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hadassah Hebrew University Medical Center, Ein Kerem
Jerusalem, Yerushalayim, Israel
Joshua Isaac Rosenbloom, MD
Hadassah Medical Center and Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
Jerusalem, Yerushalayim, Israel
Aharon Tevet, MD
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hadassah Hebrew University Medical Center, Ein Kerem
Jerusalem, Yerushalayim, Israel
Hadar Rosen, MD
Hadassah Ein-karem hospital, Obstetrics and gynecology department, Jerusalem
Jerusalem, Yerushalayim, Israel
To assess how birthweight discordancy influences the risk of urgent cesarean delivery during an attempted vaginal twin birth, and whether this risk varies based on discordancy direction, specifically, whether the larger twin is presenting (Twin A) or non-presenting (Twin B).
Study Design:
This retrospective cohort study included all diamniotic twin pregnancies at ≥32 weeks’ gestation with a cephalic-presenting first twin who underwent a trial of labor at a tertiary medical center between 1/2019-4/2025. Discordancy was defined as |Twin A – Twin B| ÷ larger twin birthweight >20%. Discordancy direction was categorized as "positive" (Twin B > Twin A) or "negative" (Twin A > Twin B). An SGA twin was defined as < 10th percentile by the Fetal Medicine Foundation birth weight charts. The Pearson correlation coefficient was employed to measure the linear correlation between discordancy and the mode of delivery.
Results:
Birthweight discordancy increases the likelihood of urgent cesarean delivery in twin pregnancies undergoing a trial of labor. The increased risk may be influenced by the high rate of SGA fetuses in discordant pairs. This risk is notably higher when the presenting twin is the larger of the pair. Potential explanations include mechanical complications during labor or provider concern about the smaller second twin wellbeing during labor.